So,
a little time has passed and there have been some encouraging signs
from the newly elected BOCC. While I was still on the Elbert County
Citizens online site with my weekly blog, I made mention of how
positive a step it was to hear from the board members that they would
like to usher in a new era of cooperation and friendliness. Jaw meet
floor. If that does not get you out of your seat and clapping, no
matter where you reside on the political spectrum here in Elbert County,
I do not know what would. I was not just saying those things so that
the administrator of the ECC would allow me to post my thoughts. The
sentiments are the same today as they were when they posted, genuine and
heartfelt.
Lest
you think I became a card carrying member of the Elbert County
Government Fan Club, let me say that there have already been some
troubling actions by a couple of our commissioners since they were sworn
into office. By now you have heard that Chris Richardson was
photographed with Planning Commission members, Ron Turner and Bob Lewis,
at the local coffee shop in Elizabeth. Of course, it got out
immediately that the ever defensive Mr. Richardson told anyone who would
listen to him that they were doing nothing inappropriate. They were
only talking about things that were appropriate and wonderful and good!
Ironically, that is the same speech given to me when I asked developer
Tim Kraft if he felt it was appropriate that he was holding meetings
with a former commissioner turned water district manager, Kurt Schlegel,
and Elbert County Manager Ed Ehmann when the county BOCC had not heard
from the planning commission on the Independence/Bandera matter at that
point. Tim got pretty miffed that I said it looks bad.
The
County Manager should not give the appearance of any impropriety and
meeting with developers and water managers gives off a certain aroma.
But Mr. Kraft assured me they would never talk about anything
inappropriate. I will let the readers decide how the situation looked.
For purposes of this blog, I will give them a temporary hall pass. Yes,
I am a retired teacher.
Then we have the new appointments to the Planning Commission (PC). Which well-informed people, who are always
on top of these important growth issues in the county, did the newly
elected commissioners select to be on this august group? Which
"in-the-know" denizens were chosen from those recognizable faces in the
crowd at all the really juicy board meetings where all of the highly
contentious growth issues had been discussed over the past few years?
Uh, what's that you say? The candidates were not people at the
forefront of the issues? They were not recognized by almost anyone in
the room? Perhaps just friends of the commissioners who might have
placed them over people who are really on top of the issues? Naw, say
it ain't so.
Okay, it is
so. It is not illegal, and certainly well within the selecting
commissioners’ rights. So again, I have to offer up yet another
temporary hall pass on the matter, but I am still getting a nose full of
that same aroma of which I mentioned earlier.
So
at some point in time, we have to establish a metric by which we
measure the newly elected Elbert County BOCC. As I stated in the title
of the blog post, this is the time to see what happens when the
proverbial rubber meets the road. The initial courtesy was extended to
the friendlier version of the Elbert County BOCC and two hall passes
were issued to them for conduct that might just be attributable to
rookie mistakes. I am good with that, I suppose...at least for now.
Where the true test of whether the new commissioners wish to really
change things and usher in a new era of responsible growth comes down to
one word. That word is transparency.
I
am suggesting that if the newly elected BOCC really wishes to have a
better relationship with the taxpayers of the county, then they have to
let them actually see any records that they have a right to see.
Let's be clear here: Nobody need information that reveals personnel
matters or health issues. Nobody needs the upper hand on competitive
bid numbers that might end up costing the county a good price on a road
grader. We get it. There are certain things that must not be made
public. But there is history that precedes this new board. There is a
path of obfuscation and denial that runs through several offices in the
courthouse and the citizens have every right to ask about what is
happening with their hard-earned tax dollars. Instead of coming out
with reasonable explanations for why they cannot, or in some cases, just
do not
wish to share information, officials have used tactics to make the
public weary and disgruntled by telling us that the records do not
exist. Equally distressing trick of saying that the request was not
specific enough.
The
courthouse in Kiowa is not the only place where this is happening.
There is legislation in the pipeline to improve this statewide quagmire
designed to keep the public and their inquisitive noses out of the
business of government employees. That would of course be fine, but
government is actually designed for transparency and short of the
private stuff that can bring harm to an entity as mentioned above, the
people have the right to know. The following link takes you to a good
article on the subject in the Denver Post, http://www.denverpost.com/2017/02/02/open-records-changes-still-needed-for-transparency/.
So
what's it going to be, Elbert County Commissioners? Are you just
putting icing on a stale loaf of old bread and calling it cake? Or, is
it really time for Elbert County to become accountable to the public and
work hand in hand with them to solve the problems that are in front of
us as we grow into the future? It is in the hands of this new board. I
know they can do it if they so choose. Now get to class.
No comments:
Post a Comment